It was posed to me this weekend by one of my dear liberal relatives, that the police killed Chris Dorner for tax payer purposes and/or police budgets. I cannot justify how he handled his situation, taking the lives of people, but they damn sure didn't kill him for financial reasons.
The police shot 3 other people during their search for him, claiming that they were mistaking the people's vehicles for Dorner's truck. Innocent mistake they say. Bullshit I call. 2 of the people were shot AFTER the police found Dorner's truck burned out and abandoned. The person who was shot (due to mistaken identity) before the police found Dorner's truck, was a 5'4'' Asian woman, a far cry from Chris Dorner, a 6'+ black man. They killed him to shut him up. Notice how the media has all but completely ignored Dorner's claims against the LAPD. I know, everyone thinks I'm Mr. Conspiracy, but in the press conference the San Bernadino police had the day after Dorner was executed, their spokes person said, and I quote, "We never intended to set the cabin on fire", a soundbite that was repeated constantly by a majority of mainstream media. Not but minutes later, as he was explaining what steps they took that led up to the cabin fire, he went on to say, "We used a cold canister tear gas bomb at first, which is not incendiary, but that didn't get the results we wanted so the decision to use the "burners" was put into place. ("burners", are a pyrotechnic type tear gas bomb, that, according to this same spokesperson, "puts out quite a bit of heat"). Police radio recordings confirmed that they deployed 7 burners, shortly after which they report the fire.
Now, if they did not intend to set the cabin on fire, that leaves only one explanation for their actions. Plain stupidity. What possible outcome could they have possibly expected to happen when they threw 7 pyrotechnic devices into a DRY WOOD CABIN?!!?
So they were either set to kill him, no matter what, or they were just too stupid to know what would happen when they threw fire into a tinderbox. Neither scenario is a valid excuse in my eyes, nor is it valid according to the laws of the constitution.
Chris Dorner's crime has become secondary now, almost obsolete if the police break the laws to get him, when a more peaceful resolution was available. The police who orchestrated and conspired to burn the cabin must be prosecuted for their crimes. Dorner cannot answer for his crimes, nor can he be confronted by his accusers, you know, the family of his victims? The forgotten group who's constitutional right to confront the man who killed their family members was taken away by the San Bernadino police department.
They acted so callously, and negligently, rushing to hush up the bad publicity coming from Dorner, that they did not even consider the laws of the land and the constitutional rights of EVERY citizen. Being willfully incompetent, (a.k.a, stupid) is not grounds to dismiss any charges, especially when we are talking about police here, who are supposed to be held to a higher standard. Sorry for ranting, but this has really serious NATIONAL implications, and it needs to be pointed out that these men violated Dorner's constitutional rights, with no real legal precedence to. Remember, and you can call me a nut all you want, but Chris Dorner was never formally charged with a crime. He alluded to it in his manifesto, but never admitted to it, was never brought before a judge, or ever formally charged. I am not by any means claiming his innocence, for all I know he is as guilty as sin. But our justice system does have procedures in place that police are supposed to follow. And it seems here that NONE of the "officials" in the area even attempted to do so.
We also need to be aware of the fact that this rant here is in NO WAY an indictment against police in general. The reports of racism and corruption in the LAPD have been around longer than I've been alive. There are great police officers in this country, and of the almost half million or so Americans that comprise local law enforcement in this country, the wicked represent a very small percentage. We can obviously take into account what positions these corrupt few hold as in what policies they allow to be set, and what offenses they turn a blind eye to.
It just makes zero sense to not expect those who are there to uphold the laws to abide by them as well. They cannot be allowed to violate the constitutional rights of ANYONE, and if this case is allowed, and no police are prosecuted for their actions, we leave it open to happen again, at total police discretion, with practically no laws restraining them, and every law restraining the American public. In other words my friends, police state;defined. LJP
Last Voice For Liberty on FaceBook
Last Voice For Liberty on YouTube
Last Voice For Liberty on Twitter
Last Voice For Liberty on worldtruth.org
And check out our partner pages as well!
Conscious Collective
#libertyNEVERsleeps
The New Generation
Alternative Journalism
